|
|
 |
Analysis of Human Health Risk from Salt Cavern Disposal
DOE funded Argonne National Laboratory to conduct an analysis
of the risk to human health through drinking water contaminated
by releases of NOW and NORM from disposal caverns.
 |
Tanker loading brine at a West Texas
disposal cavern facility. |
Contaminants of Concern
Chemical
- Arsenic
- Benzene
- Cadmium
- Chromium
Radiological
- Radium-226
- Radon-222
- Radium-228
Hydrogeological Assumptions
In order to develop a model, certain assumptions about the hydrogeology
were made:
- Depth to water table – 20 feet
- Beneath shallow aquifer is sequence of clays and silts, interspersed
with sand beds
- Recharge from precipitation
- Groundwater quality decreases with depth
- Groundwater velocity in shallow aquifer – 100 ft/yr
- Groundwater velocity at depth of cavern – 10 ft/yr
Cancer Risk Calculation
The risk from cancer is estimated using the following equation:
- Risk = intake x oral slope factor x probability of occurrence
- Oral slope factors come from EPA's IRIS (integrated risk
information system) database
- Intake is a function of exposure point concentration, intake
rate, time, frequency, duration, body weight, and averaging
time
- Exposure point concentration is modeled using a one-dimensional
solution to an advection/dispersion equation with first-order
decay
- Total risk = sum over all contaminants and paths
Non-cancer Risk Calculation
The health risk for ailments other than cancer is expressed as
hazard quotient (HQ) and is estimated using the following equation:
HQ = intake x probability of occurrence /
reference dose
Reference doses are taken from EPA's IRIS database.
Initial Concentrations
The estimated concentrations of chemical and radiological constituents
in the cavern fluids after coming to equilibrium are assumed to
be as follows:
- Chemical
- Arsenic: 1.7 mg/l
- Benzene: 20.4 mg/l
- Cadmium: 0.29 mg/l
- Chromium: 0.85 mg/l
- Radiological
- Radium-226: 1,500 pCi/l
- Radon-222: 1,500 pCi/l
Probability of Occurrence
Because no disposal caverns have ever failed, the probabilities
were estimated by asking a panel of experts to provide best-estimate
probabilities (the most likely probability) and the worst case
probabilities (not a true worst case, but the highest likely probability).
Estimates were averaged as shown below.
To check the true worst case situation, we also considered an
option under which all caverns failed (the 100% release case).
| Scenario |
Best-Estimate |
Worst-Case |
100% Release |
| Inadvertent intrusion |
0.008 |
0.017 |
1.0 |
| Seal Failure- deep |
0.031 |
0.120 |
1.0 |
| Seal Failure- shallow |
0.012 |
0.040 |
1.0 |
| Cracks/leaky interbeds |
0.022 |
0.120 |
1.0 |
| Roof collapse – deep |
0.062 |
0.163 |
1.0 |
| Roof collapse – shallow |
0.006 |
0.051 |
1.0 |
| Roof collapse – deep, seal intact |
0.100 |
0.290 |
1.0 |
|