Skip Navigation
Depleted UF6 Logo (Go to Home Page)

DUF6 GuideDUF6 Guide
 Overview Presentation
 Uranium and Its Compounds
 Depleted Uranium
 Uranium Hexafluoride
 Production and Handling
 DUF6 Health Risks
 DUF6 Environmental Risks
 DUF6 Videos
 Uranium Quick Facts



Mailing List Signup
Receive e-mail updates about this project and web site.
Search:
DUF6 Guide DU Uses DUF6 Management and Uses DUF6 Conversion EIS Documents  News FAQs Internet Resources Glossary

Depleted UF6 Environmental Risks
line line
    Storage
    Conversion
    Manufacturing
    Disposal

Conversion

A general discussion of the potential environmental impacts associated with depleted UF6 conversion activities.

Impacts Analyzed in the PEIS

The potential environmental impacts associated with conversion activities will be evaluated in detail as part of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride management program after a contract is awarded for conversion services. This page discusses in general the types of impacts that might be associated with the conversion process based on the PEIS analysis.

The PEIS evaluated the potential environmental impacts for representative conversion facilities. Conversion to uranium oxide and uranium metal were considered. Potential impacts were evaluated for a representative site, and assumed a new conversion facility would be constructed.

Impacts from Facilities Construction

Conversion of the depleted uranium inventory could result in adverse impacts to air, water, and soil quality as a result of the construction of conversion facilities. Such impacts would be typical of construction of any facility of similar size. A conversion facility was estimated to require about 40 acres of land area or less. Potential air quality impacts would be from particulate matter generated during construction; such impacts could be controlled by good construction practices. Also, construction activities have the potential to result in surface water, groundwater, or soil contamination through spills of construction chemicals. However, by following good engineering practices, concentrations in soil and wastewater (and therefore surface water and groundwater) could be kept well within applicable standards or guidelines.

Impacts From Removal of Fluorine

Conversion of depleted uranium would likely include the removal of the fluorine component from the UF6. The PEIS recognized that it is possible that HF would be produced and sold for use, thus avoiding a waste management problem. However, if an option involving CaF2 or MgF2 production was selected, it is currently unknown whether the product generated could be sold, disposed of as nonhazardous solid waste, or whether disposal as LLW would be required. The low level of uranium contamination expected for CaF2 (i.e., less than 1 ppm) suggests that sale or disposal as nonhazardous solid waste would be most likely. It is more likely that MgF2 would require disposal as LLW. If the CaF2 and MgF2 were both considered to be LLW, the largest generation volumes (about 550,000 m3) would represent about a 13% addition to the projected DOE complex-wide LLW disposal volume, and could result in a moderate adverse impact on DOE's waste management system as a whole.

Impacts From Cylinder Treatment and Disposal

Any conversion options would involve emptying the cylinders currently containing the depleted UF6. In the PEIS, it was assumed that the empty cylinders would be treated to remove the residual materials and crushed. It was assumed that the treated, crushed cylinders would become part of the DOE scrap metal inventory. If a decision to dispose of the crushed cylinders were made, the treated cylinders would be disposed of as LLW, representing a 4% addition to the projected DOE complex-wide LLW disposal volume. This would constitute a low impact on DOE's waste management system as a whole.

Other Impacts

No other adverse environmental impacts were identified for conversion in the PEIS. Socioeconomic impacts were evaluated in terms of jobs and income generated, which are considered positive impacts. Conversion was estimated to result in from 330 to 500 direct jobs and in the generation of from $20 to $28 million in direct income per operational year.

(For more details on the environmental risks from conversion, see also Section 2.4 and Appendix F of the PEIS.)




e-mail icon E-mail to a friend